And what exactly is the poster saying? That they have a contract with Facebook whereby the poster gets to use Instagram in consideration of the quantifiable amount that Facebook earns from selling any and all data that the poster gives them?
What the poster said is pretty straight-forward, if you can't understand it then the concept is either beyond you, or you don't want to understand it. You don't have to agree with what the poster is saying, but so far you haven't voiced disagreement, you've only projected ignorance (real or fake) over what the poster actually said by continually asking for clarifications. If you want to form an argument, then by all means go ahead, but none of your posts thus far are good examples of how to do that.
And to be frank, I'm not sure if I can read stuff like:
> That they have a contract with Facebook whereby the poster gets to use Instagram in consideration of the quantifiable amount that Facebook earns from selling any and all data that the poster gives them?
in any way that gives you the benefit of any doubt. I mean c'mon. The poster said that there was an "unconventional transaction" happening. Since when does a "transaction" imply such a contract? It comes across as you purposely being obtuse either because you enjoy trolling or due to some OCD-like need to be "right" on the Internet. If neither of those are true, then I apologize, but would suggest that you reflect on how you are coming across to others.
