Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We need to learn from Hollywood. Always get a share of the profit off the top. Any other kind of profit sharing is not worth it.


Always get a share of the revenue. Example: Forest Gump author got zilch because his share was based on profit and not revenue


And a share of gross revenue, at that. I'm sure all these definitions are written in the studio's favour. Apparently, Stan Lee never got anything for his creations either (and Spiderman grossed $800M+).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting


Stan Lee's famous for ripping off the creators of characters in comics he published, so I wouldn't feel too sorry for him.


'off the top' means revenues, not profits. Profit sharing opens you up to all kinds of creative accounting reducing the profits (or even turning them into a loss) to the point where you're not getting anything.

That's why they say: "profit points are for suckers".

See also: hollywood accounting.


Star Wars never made a profit, apparently: http://www.slashfilm.com/lucasfilm-tells-darth-vader-that-re...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: