Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>the severance and extended benefits are far more generous than any layoff I've been through here in the states.

IBM is pretty generous with the severance in the US too. Something like a week's pay per 6 months worked, capped at 26 weeks. If you've been working there a while, that's a half year of salary. Plus there is generally a month notice, in theory so you can find another job internally.



Former IBM'er here. The reason IBM gives severance and extended benefits is not to look good, it's to prevent their employees from filing unlawful termination suits.

Second, there is a rumor in IBM that once an employee is marked as an RA (layoff), they are placed on an HR blacklist preventing them from finding another job internally. Departments that hire an employee placed on the RA blacklist are believed to have to layoff another employee to take their place.


> Departments that hire an employee placed on the RA blacklist are believed to have to layoff another employee to take their place.

I don't understand. Why is it so important to prevent laid off workers from being rehired/transferred? What's the rationale?


I've only ever heard of one person being RA'd (she then went to Lenovo, and was eventually let go from there) and coming back. Now she's a manager at IBM again.


In my experience, a lot of people get laid off, then get hired back as contractors.


> Plus there is generally a month notice, in theory so you can find another job internally.

This is not really the case, it seems there is usually a hiring freeze for the month between when people were notified and when people are let go.


Right, that's why I said "in theory." I've never heard of it working for anyone, but it is one more month of pay.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: