Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Gertz concludes:

>But passive nihilism is also leading us to see in technologies a way to become sicker humans, humans who are trapped in an endless cycle of never being satisfied with how much “better” we have become. In other words, passive nihilism is leading us toward active nihilism, toward being able to question if we know what “better” means; to question if we know what purpose such betterment is meant to serve; to question whether we are trying to become better only for the sake of being better, for the sake of being different, for the sake of not being who we are; to question whether our pursuit of the posthuman is leading us to risk becoming inhuman because of our nihilistic desire to be anything other than merely human. It is through exploring such questions that we can destroy in order to create, in order to create new values, new goals, and new perspectives on the relationship between human progress and technological progress.

TFA (charitably): they're exploring one such question, they're at least trying to gerrymander Nietzsche's "inventing value" with the Millennial trope "creating value"





Yeah but we need to distinguish between different types of nihilism. Existential nihilism (which it is talking about) is different from moral nihilism, for example. Moral nihilism is in essence: nothing is inherently morally wrong or right, with which I used to agree.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: