>How does that not demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the regulations?
The only reason there was a recall was because of the regulations and the gargantuan and slow bureaucratic apparatus surrounding Philips.
Philips tried, and would have succeeded without the regulations, to brush this off. They stalled, delated, cajoled, and lied.
Consumer protection laws (i.e. just sue after someone dies) are almost worthless in this case. No amount of rationally acting rational actor's next of kins bringing individual actions after the death of a loved one would have gotten Philips to move. Those wouldn't have even occurred because the only reason the link was made was because of a medical device monitoring system put in place by the FDA and government medical researchers looking into anomalous death statistics whose only common factor was Philips CPAP machines and the ensuing technical evaluation. Numerous deaths occurred, were attributed by some other cause because dissecting a deceased person and examining their alveoli for microscopic particles isn't an action typically performed after someone dies of what appears to be a stroke in their sleep.
Indeed, when this whole mess first started Philips deflected and delayed for years and their teams of lawyers would have annihilated each individually rationally acting rational actor's lawyers one by one to protect their bottom line drowning each litigant in delays, appeals, and litigation by financial attrition as the cases popped up one-by-one.
"Duh gubmint" is slow and often ineffective, but in this case the only reason anything happened at all and Philips CPAP machines aren't still out there literally and actually killing people is because of "a fat cat gubmint parasite" enforcing "onerous and burdensome" laws.
Of course I could be wrong. We all remember how magnanimous and ethical corporations were prior to all of these systems being put into place, don't we?
The only reason there was a recall was because of the regulations and the gargantuan and slow bureaucratic apparatus surrounding Philips.
Philips tried, and would have succeeded without the regulations, to brush this off. They stalled, delated, cajoled, and lied.
Consumer protection laws (i.e. just sue after someone dies) are almost worthless in this case. No amount of rationally acting rational actor's next of kins bringing individual actions after the death of a loved one would have gotten Philips to move. Those wouldn't have even occurred because the only reason the link was made was because of a medical device monitoring system put in place by the FDA and government medical researchers looking into anomalous death statistics whose only common factor was Philips CPAP machines and the ensuing technical evaluation. Numerous deaths occurred, were attributed by some other cause because dissecting a deceased person and examining their alveoli for microscopic particles isn't an action typically performed after someone dies of what appears to be a stroke in their sleep.
Indeed, when this whole mess first started Philips deflected and delayed for years and their teams of lawyers would have annihilated each individually rationally acting rational actor's lawyers one by one to protect their bottom line drowning each litigant in delays, appeals, and litigation by financial attrition as the cases popped up one-by-one.
"Duh gubmint" is slow and often ineffective, but in this case the only reason anything happened at all and Philips CPAP machines aren't still out there literally and actually killing people is because of "a fat cat gubmint parasite" enforcing "onerous and burdensome" laws.
Of course I could be wrong. We all remember how magnanimous and ethical corporations were prior to all of these systems being put into place, don't we?
Wait. We don't?