Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OpenAI acts like they are some underdog startup for PR purposes while actually having access to effectively unlimited resources due to their relationship with Microsoft, which rubs people the wrong way

Plenty of other companies had released GPT powered chat bots like ChatGPT, they just couldn't offer it for free because they didn't have a sweetheart deal with Microsoft for unlimited GPUs. Google did drop the ball though, they were afraid of reputation risk. Google should have used DeepMind or another spinoff to release their internal chatbot months ago



I think you’re missing how much of a profound difference the intensive RLHF training OpenAI did makes in ChatGPT. Microsoft’s Sydney seems to also be GPT 3.5 based, came out after ChatGPT, and it was an utter dumpster fire on launch in comparison.

Meanwhile nobody has even caught up to ChatGPT yet, not even Microsoft whose resources are the secret sauce you think is the game changer, and now 4.0 is out and even more massively moved the ball forward.


No, actually. Microsoft's Sydney is GPT 4 [1].

1 - https://blogs.bing.com/search/march_2023/Confirmed-the-new-B...


Wow, yet it still managed to be worse than ChatGPT. That’s quite an achievement.


... of marketing


> to release their internal chatbot months ago

I’m not sure that would have been wise. Bard clearly isn’t ready.


Yeah but if they released earlier that fact wouldn't have been so embarassing.

As it was, they intially just claimed that releasing a competitor was irresponsible, then they eventually did it anyway (badly).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: