> The end user is not asking for https whatever, they’re asking to see the same Wikipedia page their friend saw, adapted to their screen.
This is already the behavior of Wikipedia mobile pages.
> I guess the best way to do it would be to redirect the user to the correct domain based on agent, if they haven’t already chosen an override?
This, on the other hand, is already the behavior of Wikipedia's normal pages.
The mobile page will give you what you asked for, and the normal page will give you what it thinks you probably want. These are both approaches that you could argue for.
But I can't understand why everyone is trying to argue that the give-you-what-you-want approach is actually, if you think about it hard enough, the give-you-what-you-asked-for approach.
Yes. "Always the same no matter what" is what was described. If your friend is looking at a mobile wikipedia page, and sends you the URL for that page, then you too will see the same mobile wikipedia page when you follow the link. That's the whole concept of being "the same".
No, what was described was specifically "the same Wikipedia page their friend saw, adapted to their screen". "The same Wikipedia page their friend saw" meaning the same contents - the same rendered Wikitext - they don't care about getting the same experience, they want the same data. "adapted to their screen" meaning NOT seeing the mobile experience on a desktop!
I can only assume you are trolling because you are assuming a meaning that is the complete antithesis of what namdnay explicitly said (and what everyone else in this dead thread has been telling you). Therefore I will go ahead and say farewell and good luck.
This is already the behavior of Wikipedia mobile pages.
> I guess the best way to do it would be to redirect the user to the correct domain based on agent, if they haven’t already chosen an override?
This, on the other hand, is already the behavior of Wikipedia's normal pages.
The mobile page will give you what you asked for, and the normal page will give you what it thinks you probably want. These are both approaches that you could argue for.
But I can't understand why everyone is trying to argue that the give-you-what-you-want approach is actually, if you think about it hard enough, the give-you-what-you-asked-for approach.