Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

30% is way to high an effective tax rate at that income. Below median earners pay effectively zero taxes with the EITC and standard deductible.

$400 is way too high for a car payment. You can get a great used compact for $10k. With decent credit that’ll run you $150/month.

$100 is way too high for home Internet. I pay $40/month for 100 mbps, which is more than enough for five decides to stream simultaneously.

$1400 is too high. A low earner should be saving money by getting a roommate. I can easily find rooms for rent in my medium COL metro for $700/month. Heck, I can find one bedroom houses for sale where the PITA mortgage is well below $1400.



> $100 is way too high for home Internet. I pay $40/month for 100 mbps, which is more than enough for five decides to stream simultaneously.

It's either pay that or get DSL in many places in the US.


Federal income tax, state income tax and local property and sales tax. Social Security and Medicare taxes. I agree 30% is too high an estimate for below median incomes, but its closer 9-15%, according to this: https://thecollegeinvestor.com/34072/effective-tax-rates/

And if you include health insurance--which in other countries is provided for and paid for with taxes--then it goes up. A lot.


> And if you include health insurance-

OP explicitly broke out health insurance as a separate line item.


Okay, half the tax rate and my point still stands. I responded to your other points in another comment of mine up thread. Feel free to address my rebuttal there.


$100 is not too much for internet, I pay a bit more than that and it is the only internet available at all outside of my cellphones poor 4g coverage.


I pay $100/month for internet, but that's basically the top tier offer (and I WFH every day). I could get a plan for $40.

If I were low income, I could get a plan for as little as $15 to $25/month.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: