"Is peer review also the assumption or implication of their role?
If not, should it be,"
This is what I was responding to assuming you were implying that in general should 'researchers also be paid to review, implied as part of their job description'.
As if to say 'reviewing should go hand in hand with publishing' as part of the normal paid activity of researchers.
That probably makes the most sense but would require a lot of institutions getting on board.
If not, should it be,"
This is what I was responding to assuming you were implying that in general should 'researchers also be paid to review, implied as part of their job description'.
As if to say 'reviewing should go hand in hand with publishing' as part of the normal paid activity of researchers.
That probably makes the most sense but would require a lot of institutions getting on board.