Thanks, this is much better than the incredibly vague Wolfram documentation.
Skimming through it, the links between the specific physics and the general statements about graphs seem to me to be rather weak. A typical section looks like setting up a bunch of very general definitions about graphs, and then suddenly jumping into a standard physics derivation in standard physics notation without even using the definitions you set up a page earlier. In other words, the graph stuff seems to not be doing much of the work!
But I do admit that I only skimmed. This could be an unfair assessment. I hope your papers get a good, thorough peer review.
Skimming through it, the links between the specific physics and the general statements about graphs seem to me to be rather weak. A typical section looks like setting up a bunch of very general definitions about graphs, and then suddenly jumping into a standard physics derivation in standard physics notation without even using the definitions you set up a page earlier. In other words, the graph stuff seems to not be doing much of the work!
But I do admit that I only skimmed. This could be an unfair assessment. I hope your papers get a good, thorough peer review.