Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Indeed. That's part of my own logic for myself when considering "luxury" aspects of things. I'm not an avid driver at all, and it's not at all a big part of my life - so if I were to buy a car, "good enough" may very well be just that.

Whereas if I drove every day, and would spend a lot of time in the driver seat, I'd be much more inclined to buy something nicer (as opposed to merely functional).

In this case, photography is important to me, and I spend a lot of time doing it - so it's important that I have a tool that not only works well, but feels satisfying to use. After all, it's not a very good hobby if I'm constantly being frustrated by my equipments' usability.

Likewise, it's important for me to have a really nice coffee mug - given that it's part of my daily routine and I spend a lot of time interacting with it.

What I see is that many people over-optimize and fail to account for this effect - and they skimp on things that they do use heavily, resulting in a quality of life loss that they're probably not even aware of. (e.g., daily commuters, people who spend tens of hours in a car weekly, but driving a "good enough" beater, when they can easily afford better... or hackers who buy cheap/poorly made keyboards/mice even though they spend hours with it every single day).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: