glyphosate has been scientifically tested and found harmless. There are a number of organic chemicals that have been tested to equal (or lesser) standards and found harmful.
The weight of scientific evidence is on the other side. The WHO had to ignore a lot of evidence and cherry pick which studies to use to get that result. In short I would call it scientific fraud that they make this claim.
>JMPR’s risk assessment found out that based on the weight-of-evidence approach these compounds are unlikely to cause cancer in people via dietary exposure.
I await the day where the human genome is fully sequenced (even the so called "junk parts") and we find out many of the encoded proteins are teratogenic. News Alert: "human body produces carcinogens!"
