This is part of what makes it so pernicious - they feel persecuted, but everyone else can see that they're firmly in control of everything. So it gets pointed out that they're not actually persecuted, which makes the White Moderate feel more persecuted and ignored, pushing them further right. Frustrating, but I don't know what you can do about it.
"They" is a very dangerous word in this concept because despite the genuine advantages of being white - there are many white people who are powerless and have had shitty lives. Inter-group vs intra-group differences. Someone from a minority might well have had an better life with more opportunities than someone from a privileged class. Comparing groups does not translate into comparing individuals (interestingly this is the same intellectual shortcut that leads to racism)
The folks I'm mostly talking about don't actually believe in that, so obviously my "they" was too broad, indeed.
> Someone from a minority might well have had an better life with more opportunities than someone from a privileged class.
I don't think this has anything to do with what I'm talking about, except maybe as an intentional deflection? We're talking about white resentment as a phenomenon, not Bill the blue collar veteran who was tricked into plundering loot for Halliburton in 2004 or something.
> Comparing groups does not translate into comparing individuals (interestingly this is the same intellectual shortcut that leads to racism)
Discussing race as a phenomenon doesn't make you racist, and this talking point is often used by alt-righters to make some sort of "actually, anti-racists are the REAL racists" narrative. I don't buy it.
edit: My views are failing in the marketplace of ideas! Feel free to leave a comment if you want to engage.
While some of it may be correct, that's a pretty terrible paper to use as evidence of anything, not only because it's incredibly biased but also because almost all of it is based on explorations of case studies. I have read a lot of these and contributed to some: it does this because it's pushing policy objectives. It's also from 17 years ago.
