> the point is not that "i get every job i interviewed for because i'm that good"
I'm not reading that in the quoted comment. But still
> "i get every job i really want because the enthusiasm fuels the interview".
why lead with that, to display confidence? Very well, interesting though that confidence is the argument to be made and so the presentation of the response has to agree with the argument. But that still lacks some sympathy and isn't constructive, when it's addressed at the lack of confidence (which admittedly seem obvious from posting about the issue on HN).
> nothing to do with a lack of ambition. enthusiasm is the only thing
Interesting, I'm not aware of the difference. I'd say ambition subsumes enthusiasm.
> Interesting, I'm not aware of the difference. I'd say ambition subsumes enthusiasm.
i can understand where your coming from: there is probably truth to the idea that... in general, if you are ambitious you will be enthusiastic or vice versa. but:
1. they are not mutually exclusive. to apply for a job you are underqualified for and disinterested in would be both ambitious and unenthusiastic. in practice this might not really happen but...
2. for the purpose of the interview, any enthusiasm is useless if you don't have the charisma to project it. ambition is more of a factor for you to internalize. it is relative to your own experience. enthusiasm is different. it's more important to externalize. i care if i'm ambitious, the interviewer cares if i'm enthusiastic. i don't want to hire someone who doesn't love the job- and if they love it i don't care if they're overqualified (lacking ambition).
> why lead with that, to display confidence?
in my experience, this again is more of an internal thing. it's not that externalizing confidence is valuable (probably more of a liability, really). it's that confidence manifests itself in other ways that are inspiring or attractive. for instance, i am pretty humble and sometimes nervous; i hate selling myself. but when i'm genuinely excited for a position, it's easier to suppress the instinct not to brag.
> that still lacks some sympathy and isn't constructive ...
your mindset needs to be "i'm really excited to apply for this job because it's totally awesome and i can kick it's ass" -- not "i'm applying for this job because i really hate my current job". the right type of confidence and enthusiasm will only come from the former. i realize this argument is kind of... philosophical?, just trying my best to generalize what's lead to any success i've come by :)
I'm not reading that in the quoted comment. But still
> "i get every job i really want because the enthusiasm fuels the interview".
why lead with that, to display confidence? Very well, interesting though that confidence is the argument to be made and so the presentation of the response has to agree with the argument. But that still lacks some sympathy and isn't constructive, when it's addressed at the lack of confidence (which admittedly seem obvious from posting about the issue on HN).
> nothing to do with a lack of ambition. enthusiasm is the only thing
Interesting, I'm not aware of the difference. I'd say ambition subsumes enthusiasm.