What has struck me as most odd about this story is that I haven't heard any national news organizations really pick this up and run with it. Why? Is this story too hard to wedge into sound bytes? The dearth of coverage bothers me.
I'll be amused that after some more investigation a pattern is found in the files (name, date modified, etc) and it appears chunks of the pattern are missing.
As far as I know the camera LED in MacBooks is hardwired to the camera. You can’t turn it off in software. If the camera gets power the LED gets power (as it should be).
right, but students were told it is a bug.. I dont know for sure, but probably by that sys admin lady whos job it was to administer the laptops.
I dunno about you, but I just find this whole thing way to bizarre. How it was found out, the magnitude, the fact that it seems one person has done all of this.
> the fact that it seems one person has done all of this.
Uh, where did you get that? The spying software was installed as a matter of school policy; it wasn't the act of a rogue admin deciding to wire up the school laptops to feed their appetites. They had budget meetings where they took notes about how much it would cost to purchase a site license that would cover the installation of this software on all of the school computers; everyone up to the school board participated in and signed off on this. It was not a secret.
> The students will be able to view the images with or without their parents, and request that the court block their parents from seeing "sensitive" photos if they so choose.